ArticleJTCVS open2026
Long-term clinical outcomes in patients aged 50 to 70 years old undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement in the United Kingdom.
Article in JTCVS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: In the last decade, there has been an increased use of biological prosthesis in patients aged 50 to 70 years old undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted health care services, which may have affected this trend. This study aims to evaluate the trends in prosthesis use and long-term clinical outcomes in patients aged 50 to 70 years old who underwent SAVR before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in all patients aged 50 to 70 years who underwent first-time, elective/urgent isolated SAVR from January 2013 to April 2025. Results: A total of 11,010 patients underwent SAVR during the study period, with a median age of 63.4 years (first and third quartile: 58.6, 67.0 years), of whom 67% (n = 7359) were male. The use of biological prosthesis increased from 57.5% in 2013 to 71.3% in 2024. Patients who received a mechanical prosthesis when compared with a biological prosthesis had a lower all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.03-1.43; Conclusions: The use of biological prosthesis has increased incrementally since 2013 and persisted post-COVID-19 pandemic. Mechanical valves had a lower all-cause mortality, cumulative incidence of infective endocarditis, and need for repeat intervention. However, they were associated with a greater incidence of stroke and bleeding. The lifetime management of this group of patients remains complex, and long-term high-quality randomised controlled trials are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.