ArticleJTCVS open2026
MVRepairAI: A machine learning-based system to predict surgical methods in mitral valve repair.
Article in JTCVS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond the hazard ratio: machine learning and the future of personalized mitral valve repair counseling.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to develop a machine learning model, MVRepairAI, that predicts appropriate surgical repair techniques for mitral valve pathology using preoperative echocardiographic data. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 180 patients who underwent primary mitral valve repair between 2017 and 2019. Preoperative transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography reports were documented, which detailed segmental pathology, etiologic determinants, and morphologic features. The MVRepairAI model used a hierarchical clinical decision tree to predict surgical techniques on the basis of these echocardiographic data. Predicted techniques were compared with documented operative techniques using multiclass accuracy metrics, precision, recall, and F1 scores. Subgroup validation assessed resection-type precision and technique disagreement across etiological strata. Results: MVRepairAI achieved 92.22% overall accuracy (95% CI, 89.1-94.7%; Conclusions: MVRepairAI demonstrates the potential of artificial intelligence to convert preoperative imaging into surgically pertinent plans for mitral valve repair. The hierarchical model structure showed substantial concordance with operative approaches across diverse pathologic presentations. Future refinements require rigorous multicenter validation, integration of dynamic intraoperative data, and longitudinal outcomes analysis to further advance this foundational platform for standardized, patient-specific mitral valve restoration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.