ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Clinic Flow Metrics Before and After Relocation to a New Academic Eye Institute.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the association of clinic workflow changes following relocation to a new eye institute with imaging wait time and total patient visit duration. Patients and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 1815 patients seen in glaucoma and retina clinics at an academic ophthalmology practice during 3-month periods before and after relocation. Electronic health record metadata were used to measure visit components. Operational changes included increased imaging staff, additional imaging devices, expanded clinic space, and implementation of a decentralized workflow with an optical coherence tomography (OCT) device embedded within a glaucoma clinic pod. Primary outcomes were imaging wait time and total visit duration before and after relocation. Associations between patient demographic and clinical variables and clinic flow metrics were also evaluated. Results: For combined glaucoma and retina services, median imaging wait time decreased from 21 minutes (IQR, 13-33; n=1259) before relocation to 11 minutes (IQR, 6-19; n=1244) afterward. The median paired difference was -11.0 minutes (IQR, -21 to 0; n=958; Conclusion: Relocation to a new clinic was associated with clinically meaningful reductions in imaging wait time and total visit duration. Although specific operational changes were not independently evaluated, expanded imaging resources and workflow optimization may have contributed to improved clinic efficiency and patient throughput.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.