Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42604117›Full record

ArticleJTCVS open2026

Transitioning from neoadjuvant chemoradiation to perioperative chemotherapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma: Impact on margins and pathologic outcomes.

Paolo de Angelis, Seif Elmankabadi, Samuel J Klempner, Matthew R Strickland, Jeffrey W Clark, Theodore S Hong, Florence K Keane, Hannah J Roberts, Jennifer Y Wo, Jonathan Glickman and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTCVS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Paolo de AngelisDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Mass.
Seif ElmankabadiDivision of Thoracic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif.
Samuel J KlempnerDivision of Oncology, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Mass.
Matthew R StricklandDivision of Oncology, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Mass.
Jeffrey W ClarkDivision of Oncology, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Mass.
Theodore S HongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Mass.
Florence K KeaneDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Mass.
Hannah J RobertsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Mass.
Jennifer Y WoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Mass.
Jonathan GlickmanDepartment of Pathology, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Mass.
David M JablonsDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif.
Hugh G AuchinclossDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Mass.
Christina CostantinoDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Mass.
Michael LanutiDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Mass.
Johannes R KratzDivision of Thoracic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif.
Uma M SachdevaDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Mass.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Treatment of esophageal adenocarcinoma has historically involved trimodality therapy. Recently, perioperative chemotherapy has become standard of care due to improved survival. We investigated the implications of this change on surgical and pathologic outcomes. Methods: This multicenter retrospective analysis included adults who underwent esophagogastrectomy for esophageal/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma between 2023 and 2025. The primary outcome was any positive margin on final pathology. Secondary outcomes included rates of nodal upstage and posttreatment tumor characteristics. Fisher exact and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for comparisons. Results: In total, 110 patients were included; 22 received perioperative chemotherapy (20.0%), 48 chemoradiation (chemoRT, 43.6%), and 40 induction chemotherapy followed by chemoRT (chemo + chemoRT, 36.3%). On final pathology, 36.4% of patients experienced nodal upstaging in the chemotherapy group (n = 8) relative to 16.7% (n = 8) and 7.5% (n = 3) in the chemoRT and chemo + chemoRT groups ( Conclusions: In this small multi-institutional study, chemotherapy-only preoperative regimens seemed to be associated with increased rates of nodal upstage and margin positivity after esophagectomy relative to radiotherapy-inclusive protocols.

Indexed as

esophageal canceresophagectomyneoadjuvant treatmentperioperative chemotherapyradiation

Identifiers

PMID42604117
PMCPMC13477001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.