ReviewCureus2026
Non-pharmacological Interventions for Pain-Related Anxiety and Distress in Emergency Department Patients: A Systematic Review With Narrative Synthesis.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pain-related anxiety, fear, and distress are common challenges in emergency departments and may influence pain perception, patient cooperation, satisfaction, and the overall care experience. This systematic review and narrative synthesis examined evidence on non-pharmacological interventions for pain intensity, emotional distress, patient experience, and analgesic-related outcomes among emergency department patients. A structured search was conducted from database inception to May 2026 using PubMed/MEDLINE, Semantic Scholar, Google Scholar, Elicit, publisher webpages, DOI checking, and citation tracking. Only English-language reports with sufficient extractable data were included. Eligible studies included original interventional, feasibility, pilot, quasi-experimental, quality improvement, and qualitative studies conducted in emergency department settings. Twenty-five studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, including randomized, pilot randomized, non-randomized, quality improvement, feasibility, and qualitative evidence. Interventions were grouped into music and sound-based interventions, virtual reality and distraction-based interventions, and acupuncture-based interventions, reflecting the main non-pharmacological approaches identified in the included emergency department literature. Overall, findings were more consistently favorable for short-term anxiety, fear, distress, coping, comfort, satisfaction, and patient experience than for pain intensity, which remained variable across studies. No pooled effect estimate was calculated because of substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity, and individual study findings varied by intervention type, comparator, population, setting, outcome measure, and timing of assessment. Music and sound-based interventions showed possible short-term benefits for anxiety, comfort, and patient experience, but pain findings were mixed. Virtual reality and distraction-based interventions showed the most consistent favorable findings in pediatric and procedural contexts, particularly for anxiety, fear, coping, and distress, although analgesic effects were heterogeneous. Acupuncture showed preliminary favorable findings mainly in selected adult acute pain settings, but the evidence was limited by feasibility, quality improvement, and qualitative designs. Risk-of-bias concerns included small samples, limited blinding, subjective outcomes, heterogeneity in measurement tools, and short follow-up periods. Because GRADE was not performed, certainty of evidence was interpreted narratively and should be considered limited. Current evidence suggests possible short-term benefits from non-pharmacological interventions for pain-related emotional distress and patient experience in selected emergency department contexts, but definitive analgesic effectiveness, sustained benefit, and analgesic-sparing effects remain uncertain. Further adequately powered pragmatic trials are needed to determine clinically meaningful effects, analgesic-use and opioid-sparing outcomes, and real-world implementation feasibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.