ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2026
Comparative Outcomes of Rectangle Recession Versus Eponychial Folding Flaps for Nail-Plate Length After Fingertip Amputation.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Fingertip amputations affect the distal phalanx, pulp, and nail complex, with considerable impact on both function and appearance. Although various flap techniques are used for soft-tissue coverage, restoration of apparent nail-plate exposure is often neglected. This study aimed to compare the functional and aesthetic outcomes of two apparent nail-plate exposure techniques, the rectangle recession flap and the eponychial folding flap, in patients with fingertip amputations. Neither technique creates new nail tissue; both modify the proximal nail-fold to expose a greater proportion of the already-present nail-plate. Methods: This was a prospective comparative study conducted from June 2023 to June 2024 at a tertiary care specialty hospital. Sixty patients with fingertip amputations were randomized using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes into the rectangle recession flap group (group A, n = 30) or the eponychial folding flap group (group B, n = 30). A biostatistician was involved in both sequence generation and statistical validation. Patients were assessed at regular intervals over a 3-month postoperative period. Primary outcome measures included apparent gain in visible nail-plate exposure (as a percentage of the contralateral normal), scar quality, sensation, and overall aesthetic satisfaction using validated scoring systems. Results: The study revealed significant differences between the two techniques in terms of apparent gain in visible nail-plate exposure and functional outcomes. Patients who underwent the eponychial folding flap technique demonstrated superior outcomes, particularly in terms of visible nail-plate exposure, scar quality, appearance, and postoperative pain. Conclusions: Both techniques are viable options for increasing apparent visible nail-plate exposure in fingertip reconstruction; however, the eponychial folding flap provides superior outcomes in terms of visible nail-plate exposure, scar quality, and aesthetic restoration, and may be preferred in appropriate cases. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.