ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2026
Impact of Hydrogel Spacer on Radiation Proctitis After Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy: A Large-Scale Claims Database Analysis.
Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: We evaluated the real-world utility of hydrogel spacer placement for reducing radiation proctitis following prostate cancer radiation therapy using a large-scale claims database. Methods and Materials: We analyzed male patients from a Japanese administrative claims database (DeSC Database) who initiated primary radiation therapy between July 2018 and December 2024. Propensity score weighting using the average treatment effect on the treated method was applied to balance baseline characteristics between spacer users and nonusers. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of endoscopic gastrointestinal hemostasis, and the secondary endpoint was the diagnosis of radiation proctitis. Fine-Gray models were used to estimate subdistribution hazard ratios (sHRs) with death as a competing risk. Results: Of 7860 eligible patients, 1754 (22.3%) underwent spacer placement. For the primary endpoint (endoscopic hemostasis), the spacer group showed a statistically significant lower risk (sHR 0.26; 95% CI, 0.10-0.69; Conclusions: This large-scale real-world analysis demonstrates that hydrogel spacer placement is associated with a significantly lower incidence of severe radiation proctitis requiring endoscopic hemostasis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.