ReviewAdvances in medical education and practice2026
Entrustment in Doctor-Patient Communication in Family Medicine Training - a Systematic Review of the Literature.
Review in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over recent decades, postgraduate medical education has shifted increasingly towards competency-based frameworks. Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) have emerged as a key approach to integrating the assessment of professional practice. While communication is widely recognised as a core competence in Family Medicine, its explicit operationalisation as EPAs remains unclear. This review aimed to map and conceptually analyse how EPAs have been applied to doctor-patient communication in Family Medicine training and to identify communication-intensive clinical activities that can be conceptualised as EPAs. We conducted a systematic review of the literature with qualitative evidence synthesis across five electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCO, and SciELO), complemented by citation searching, for studies published in English, Portuguese, Spanish, and French up to October 2025. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, all using qualitative methodologies, including Delphi studies, expert consensus processes, and focus groups. Communication was most often addressed as a transversal competence embedded within broader EPAs. However, five studies identified 10 discrete communication-focused EPAs, clustered into four domains: breaking bad news, shared decision-making and patient-centred care, dealing with strong emotions, and motivational interviewing or behaviour modification. The findings indicate that, although communication is central to Family Medicine practice, its framing as a set of autonomous, communication-intensive EPAs is still in its early stages of development. Conceptualising high-stakes communication encounters as EPAs may support a more integrative and practice-oriented approach to workplace-based assessment, while highlighting the need for further research on their longitudinal educational impact in postgraduate training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.