ArticleClinical epidemiology2026
Classification of Inpatient and Outpatient Contacts in the Danish National Patient Register: Epidemiological Implications and Future Directions.
Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Danish National Patient Register (DNPR) is an important data source for register-based health-related research, providing detailed information on all hospital contacts in Denmark. With the transition from the second version of the DNPR (DNPR2) to the third version (DNPR3) in early 2019, the variable distinguishing inpatient and outpatient contacts was discontinued, introducing substantial methodological challenges for epidemiological research. This perspective provides a narrative synthesis of current approaches to classifying hospital stays in DNPR3 and highlights key epidemiological considerations. Two main methodological approaches were identified: consensus-based frameworks, which emphasize interpretability and clinical reasoning and data-driven algorithms, which leverage patterns in register data to improve classification performance. Existing methods generally provide reasonable classification for inpatient and elective outpatient contacts. However, classification of acute outpatient visits remains a persistent and unresolved challenge, reflecting heterogeneous registration practices and the absence of a gold-standard reference in DNPR3. Further, current methodological approaches are fragmented and context-dependent, limiting comparability across studies and over time. We therefore call for coordinated efforts to develop transparent, validated, and consensus-driven classification frameworks. Such efforts are essential to ensure valid, reproducible, and interpretable epidemiological research using DNPR data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.