Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42604063›Full record

ArticleClinical epidemiology2026

Classification of Inpatient and Outpatient Contacts in the Danish National Patient Register: Epidemiological Implications and Future Directions.

Ann-Sophie Buchardt, Jacob Bodilsen, Lene Wohlfahrt Dreyer, Kirsten Skjærbæk Duch, Pi Vejsig Madsen, Bergur Magnussen, Rasmus Gregersen Mottlau, Jens-Jakob Møller, Flemming Skjøth, Marie Villumsen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ann-Sophie BuchardtMary Elizabeths Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2567-9350
Jacob Bodilsen *Department of Infectious Diseases, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7398-814X
Lene Wohlfahrt Dreyer *Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Kirsten Skjærbæk Duch *Center for Rheumatic Research Aalborg (CERRA) and Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5984-5134
Pi Vejsig Madsen *Mary Elizabeths Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0001-0002-8674
Bergur Magnussen *Center for Rheumatic Research Aalborg (CERRA) and Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Rasmus Gregersen Mottlau *Department of Emergency Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9439-4933
Jens-Jakob Møller *OPEN - Open Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8771-4940
Flemming Skjøth *Research Support Unit, Hospital Lillebaelt, University Hospitals of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2975-647X
Marie Villumsen *Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Andreas JensenMary Elizabeths Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4302-2982

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Danish National Patient Register (DNPR) is an important data source for register-based health-related research, providing detailed information on all hospital contacts in Denmark. With the transition from the second version of the DNPR (DNPR2) to the third version (DNPR3) in early 2019, the variable distinguishing inpatient and outpatient contacts was discontinued, introducing substantial methodological challenges for epidemiological research. This perspective provides a narrative synthesis of current approaches to classifying hospital stays in DNPR3 and highlights key epidemiological considerations. Two main methodological approaches were identified: consensus-based frameworks, which emphasize interpretability and clinical reasoning and data-driven algorithms, which leverage patterns in register data to improve classification performance. Existing methods generally provide reasonable classification for inpatient and elective outpatient contacts. However, classification of acute outpatient visits remains a persistent and unresolved challenge, reflecting heterogeneous registration practices and the absence of a gold-standard reference in DNPR3. Further, current methodological approaches are fragmented and context-dependent, limiting comparability across studies and over time. We therefore call for coordinated efforts to develop transparent, validated, and consensus-driven classification frameworks. Such efforts are essential to ensure valid, reproducible, and interpretable epidemiological research using DNPR data.

Indexed as

epidemiological methodshealth careinpatient and outpatient classificationregister-based research

Identifiers

PMID42604063
PMCPMC13476752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.