ArticleiScience2026
Examining the nexus between household livelihood vulnerability and ecosystem service dependence in southern Shaanxi.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urban resettlement is a key mechanism for promoting ecological conservation and improving livelihoods. This study investigates how urban resettlement influences the relationship between household livelihood vulnerability and the index of dependence on ecosystem services (IDES). Using survey data from 657 households in Ankang prefecture, Shaanxi province, China, we analyze this relationship in the context of resettlement. Using the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) "exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity" framework for assessing livelihood vulnerability, and measuring IDES across provisioning, regulating, and cultural services, households are classified into four "vulnerability-dependence" categories via the four-quadrant method. The findings indicate that (1) relocated households exhibit significantly higher livelihood vulnerability and lower overall IDES than non-relocated households; (2) new-stage relocation and higher subsidies increase the likelihood of households being in the "high vulnerability-low dependence" and "low vulnerability-low dependence" categories; and (3) long-distance relocation significantly reduces the probability of households falling into the "low vulnerability-high dependence" category. To address ongoing challenges, policymakers should optimize resource management, facilitate livelihood transformation, and thereby enhancing both livelihood and ecological security.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.