Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42604005›Full record

ReviewInternet interventions2026

Leveraging expectation effects to improve outcomes in the context of digital mental health interventions.

Carmen Schaeuffele, Stephanie Haering, Christina Kampisiou, Yvonne Nestoriuc, Marcel Wilhelm, Winfried Rief, Christine Knaevelsrud

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Internet interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carmen SchaeuffeleFreie Universität Berlin, Dept. of Education and Psychology, Clinical-Psychological Intervention, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Stephanie HaeringFreie Universität Berlin, Dept. of Education and Psychology, Clinical-Psychological Intervention, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Christina KampisiouFreie Universität Berlin, Dept. of Education and Psychology, Clinical-Psychological Intervention, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Yvonne NestoriucHelmut-Schmidt-Universität/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Holstenhofweg 85, 22043, Hamburg, Germany.
Marcel WilhelmPhilipps University of Marburg, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Gutenbergstr. 18, 35032, Marburg, Germany.
Winfried RiefPhilipps University of Marburg, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Gutenbergstr. 18, 35032, Marburg, Germany.
Christine KnaevelsrudFreie Universität Berlin, Dept. of Education and Psychology, Clinical-Psychological Intervention, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, 14195, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients' expectations about treatment benefits are robust predictors of clinical outcomes across medical and psychological contexts. Recent evidence suggests that expectancy effects in digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) are comparable in magnitude to those observed in face-to-face treatments. Despite their relevance, systematic guidance on how expectations can be shaped and optimized within DMHIs is limited. This narrative review summarizes theoretical and empirical work on expectations, including placebo and nocebo mechanisms, and digital intervention design to outline how expectation principles may be integrated into DMHIs. We describe three overarching principles - proactive expectation management, warmth and competence, and observational learning - and discuss how these mechanisms can be translated into practice across different stages and components of DMHI, including recruitment and onboarding, content, guidance, and interface design. We further highlight opportunities for expectation monitoring, automated feedback, and just-in-time adaptive interventions to support expectations. While modifications to single components may yield limited effects, coordinated, expectation-informed optimization across multiple DMHI components may have the potential to meaningfully enhance engagement and clinical outcomes. We conclude by discussing conceptual and methodological considerations and outline promising future directions for integrating the expectation lens within digital mental health.

Indexed as

Digital mental health interventionExpectationsNocebo effectsObservational learningPersonalizationPersuasive designPlacebo effectsTherapeutic alliance

Identifiers

PMID42604005
PMCPMC13476581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.