ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2026
Iatrogenic Nerve Injuries Affecting Upper Limb Function: Medicolegal Implications.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Nerve injuries are among the commonest iatrogenic complications and most frequently are the result of direct intraoperative damage causing serious distress and long-term morbidity. Additionally, they can add a considerable financial burden to health care systems, while they constitute a well-known source of medicolegal implications. There are few published articles addressing the medicolegal consequences of the iatrogenic nerve injuries affecting upper limb function. Our aim was to identify malpractice claims related to iatrogenic nerve injuries affecting upper limb function and to define the reasons of successful litigations. Methods: This is a retrospective study of all malpractice claims concerning iatrogenic nerve injuries related to upper limb function, which ended in a trial in a European country, within a 20-year period (2000-2019). The data were obtained from the archives of the Council of State of the country and were further analyzed to identify the number of claims related to iatrogenic nerve injuries affecting the function of the upper limb. Results: In total, there were 13 cases associated with the brachial plexus (6), spinal accessory (3), median (1), radial (1), and digital nerves (2). The injuries were related to upper limb or neck surgery and to vaginal deliveries, most complicated with shoulder dystocia. Eight cases closed in favor of the plaintiff, three in favor of the defendant, while two remained still open, at the time the study was conducted. The mean indemnity payment was €67.634 (€10.000-201.697), with the highest payments set for cases that required further operative reconstruction. Conclusions: Negligence claims are increasing worldwide, with a considerable impact on health systems and involved surgeons. Identifying the reasons for successful litigations will help surgeons take necessary preventive measures to minimize implications. Type of study/level of evidence: Observational IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.