ArticleiScience2026
Balancing safety and efficiency in large-scale HRC: A dynamic scheduling method confronting temporal and spatial uncertainty of human workers.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In large-scale human-robot collaboration (HRC) workshops, humans exhibit dual uncertainty: temporal uncertainty in task completion times and spatial uncertainty in limb movements. These intertwined uncertainties create a fundamental tension between safety and efficiency. We propose a dynamic scheduling framework addressing both dimensions. For spatial uncertainty, a Perception-Prediction-Decision (PPD) framework is constructed, integrating Age-of-Information-based link resource allocation, digital twin elastic deployment, and probabilistic occupancy grid-based collision prediction to proactively maintain safety. For temporal uncertainty, an Improved Deep Q-Network (IDQN) algorithm is proposed, featuring an idle-duration-based executor priority mechanism, constraint-based action masking, and dynamic priority experience replay. Across 15 test scenarios, the PPD framework reduces collision response triggers by 59.9% while decreasing average Makespan by 12.1%; IDQN achieves only 2.5% performance degradation under high-volatility conditions, significantly outperforming DQN (6.0%), GA (9.7%), and rule-based methods (8.4%).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.