Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42603988›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Balancing safety and efficiency in large-scale HRC: A dynamic scheduling method confronting temporal and spatial uncertainty of human workers.

Houxue Xia, Zhenyu Sun, Huagang Tong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Houxue XiaSchool of Economics and Management, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China.
Zhenyu SunSchool of Economics and Management, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China.
Huagang TongSchool of Economics and Management, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In large-scale human-robot collaboration (HRC) workshops, humans exhibit dual uncertainty: temporal uncertainty in task completion times and spatial uncertainty in limb movements. These intertwined uncertainties create a fundamental tension between safety and efficiency. We propose a dynamic scheduling framework addressing both dimensions. For spatial uncertainty, a Perception-Prediction-Decision (PPD) framework is constructed, integrating Age-of-Information-based link resource allocation, digital twin elastic deployment, and probabilistic occupancy grid-based collision prediction to proactively maintain safety. For temporal uncertainty, an Improved Deep Q-Network (IDQN) algorithm is proposed, featuring an idle-duration-based executor priority mechanism, constraint-based action masking, and dynamic priority experience replay. Across 15 test scenarios, the PPD framework reduces collision response triggers by 59.9% while decreasing average Makespan by 12.1%; IDQN achieves only 2.5% performance degradation under high-volatility conditions, significantly outperforming DQN (6.0%), GA (9.7%), and rule-based methods (8.4%).

Indexed as

deep reinforcement learningdynamic schedulinghuman-robot collaborationhuman uncertainty

Identifiers

PMID42603988
PMCPMC13476530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.