ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2026
Feasibility of Activity Monitors to Assess Physical Capacity After Critical Illness: An Observational Study Nested Within a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05167734 (The Practical Anemia Bundle for SusTained Blood Recovery), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Practical Anemia Bundle for SusTained Blood Recovery (PABST-BR) Clinical Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To determine if daily physical performance measures collected remotely through a wrist-worn activity monitor (AM) could serve as a reliable alternative to the clinic-based 6-minute walk test (6MWT) for assessing physical capacity after critical illness. Patients and Methods: Participants were recruited from a group of critically ill adults aged ≥18 years with moderate-to-severe anemia as they enrolled in a parallel-group, single-center randomized clinical trial assessing the impact of a multifaceted anemia prevention and treatment strategy vs standard care at intensive care units at a large US medical center. The nested prospective observational study was conducted from September 2022 to October 2025. Participants were instructed to wear a wrist-worn AM for 4 days in their free-living environments at 1 month and 3 months post-hospitalization to coincide with their clinic-based 6MWTs. Mean daily step counts and maximum daily cadences were calculated from the AM. Results: Fifty-two participants (median [interquartile range] age, 66 [60-71]; 29 men) were enrolled. Over 80% of participants completed monitoring and provided valid data. Mean daily step count (r Conclusion: Home-based wrist-worn AM use is feasible after critical illness with high retention and adherence rates. The strong correlation between daily maximum cadence and 6MWT distance suggests this device can effectively evaluate physical performance and recovery in intensive care unit survivors remotely. These findings provide valuable preliminary data to guide the design of large clinical trials. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05167734 (2021-12-09).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.