ArticleIntestinal Failure (New York, N.Y.)
Patient perspectives on barriers to care and the perceived value of a direct-to-patient virtual learning program for chronic intestinal failure.
Article in Intestinal Failure (New York, N.Y.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: There is a shortage of clinical expertise in chronic intestinal failure (CIF). We aimed to explore patient perspectives on the need for an evidence-based virtual tele-learning program to train patients in best practice CIF care using the ECHO™ Model. Findings were used to inform development of the Patient Intestinal Failure-ECHO (PIF-ECHO) Project.Material and Methods: Using a qualitative research design, this study included interviews with six CIF patient advocates and two virtual focus groups with nine individuals living with CIF who expressed interest in PIF-ECHO. Data were coded and analyzed using iterative thematic analysis to generate themes focused on perceived need for and value of PIF-ECHO. Results: Four main themes were identified: 1) lack of provider access and support for patients living with CIF, 2) high levels of patient responsibility for disease management, self-advocacy, and system navigation, 3) limited access to patient-facing information on best practice CIF care, and, 4) severe emotional strain. Perceived value of PIF-ECHO centered on the program's potential to improve knowledge and access to resources, which participants hypothesized would lead to improved capacity for disease self-management, and ability to advocate for their needs across healthcare settings. Findings informed the development of a PIF-ECHO logic model illustrating connections between program activities and anticipated outcomes. Conclusion: A patient-facing ECHO program for CIF has the potential to address patient-identified needs related to access to specialist expertise and patient education, ultimately improving CIF patients' ability to manage their own care and advocate for their needs across systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.