ArticleBiomedical engineering letters2026
Impact of brain anisotropy on transcranial temporal interference stimulation: numerical analysis toward reliable montage optimization.
Article in Biomedical engineering letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Temporal Interference Electrical Stimulation for Neuropsychiatric Disorders: Mechanisms, Applications, and Translational Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcranial temporal interference stimulation (TIS) is gaining attention as a non-invasive method for engaging deep brain regions. However, TIS-generated current flow to deep targets necessarily passes through highly anisotropic white-matter pathways, and the extent to which anisotropy alters interferential fields remains insufficiently quantified. This study systematically evaluates how anisotropic conductivity affects deep-brain interferential fields and influences TIS montage optimization. Subject-specific anatomical head models incorporating either anisotropic or isotropic conductivities were constructed. For the anisotropic condition, full conductivity tensors were derived from diffusion-weighted imaging for gray matter, white matter, and deep targets. Interferential fields were examined using Pareto-based optimization to compare montage selection between conductivity models. Anisotropy altered interferential field intensities by up to 18% in white matter and remained below 12% in deep targets. These differences resulted in a 50% divergence in optimized montages. When constraining focality and target-field differences to within 10%, montage agreement increased to nearly 90%. Anisotropic conductivities influence focality and field orientation and optimal montage selection. Nonetheless, under practical tolerance ranges for focality and target-field strength, optimized solutions converge across conductivity models. These results indicate that isotropic models can support routine TIS montage optimization when diffusion data are unavailable, while anisotropy remains essential for accurate deep-brain stimulation modeling. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13534-026-00575-y.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.