Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42603924›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of New Zealand2026

A Theoretically Grounded, Behaviour-Science-Informed Model for Understanding Citizen Biosecurity Reporting.

Lynette J McLeod, Donald W Hine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lynette J McLeodSchool of Psychology Speech and Hearing University of Canterbury Christchurch New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9408-3342
Donald W HineSchool of Psychology Speech and Hearing University of Canterbury Christchurch New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3905-7026

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Citizen reporting of biosecurity threats is an important yet inconsistently practiced element of environmental surveillance. This study examines the behavioural factors shaping reporting in Aotearoa New Zealand by conceptualising reporting as a multi-step process influenced by psychological, social, and structural conditions. Drawing on behavioural science, we apply the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour model alongside audience segmentation to identify barriers and drivers of reporting using a national survey of 957 New Zealand adults. Latent profile analysis identified four distinct behavioural segments-Engaged Reporters, Reluctant Reporters, Willing but Unaware and Disconnected Non-reporters-characterised by differing levels of capability, opportunity and motivation. While public awareness of the importance of biosecurity has grown, personal engagement in surveillance activities remains comparatively limited. These findings suggest that constraints to reporting arise from a combination of informational, motivational and structural factors, which vary across population groups. Rather than prescribing specific interventions, the study provides a behavioural diagnostic that can inform the development of more targeted and context-sensitive engagement strategies. Importantly, the effectiveness of citizen reporting depends not only on individual behaviour but also on the capacity and responsiveness of the systems that receive and act on reports. As such, efforts to enhance reporting should consider both citizen engagement and system-level design. By integrating behavioural theory with audience segmentation, this study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of citizen participation in biosecurity and highlights the importance of aligning behavioural insights with practical and institutional considerations. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of intervention strategies and examine how reporting behaviours translate into biosecurity outcomes in real-world contexts.

Indexed as

Aotearoa New Zealandaudience segmentationBehaviour Change Wheelbiosecurity riskintervention designlatent profile analysis

Identifiers

PMID42603924
PMCPMC13476459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.