ArticleNPJ dementia2026
Psychometric properties of the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale - Peruvian Version among Indigenous Amazonian communities.
Article in NPJ dementia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive screening tools are rarely validated for Indigenous populations of Latin America, a barrier to early dementia detection. We culturally adapted and evaluated the psychometric performance of the Peruvian version of the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS-PE) for Shawi Indigenous Amazonian communities. We included 434 adults aged ≥50 years who completed the RUDAS-PE. Cognitive interviews and community feedback revealed cultural mismatches, particularly in visuoconstruction tasks, requiring linguistic and contextual item modifications. The original 6-item structure showed poor fit, while a 5-item version demonstrated strong unidimensionality and improved model fit (confirmatory factor analysis, comparative fit index = 0.97; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.06). Item response analyses confirmed high measurement precision at low-moderate educational levels and identified severe floor effects in visuoconstruction. Culturally-valid adaptations of brief cognitive tools, particularly the visuoconstruction domain, are essential to avoid diagnostic bias in Indigenous populations. Our findings provide a scalable framework for adaptation of cognitive screening for Indigenous communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.