ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2026
Narratives on Sexuality in Vulvodynia and Endometriosis: A Qualitative Study on Italian Couples.
Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although qualitative research on dyspareunia has increased in recent years, most studies have focused on women's individual experiences or on specific difficulties within the couple, leaving underexplored how partners jointly construct the meanings of sexuality when pain becomes part of the relationship. Against this backdrop, this study explored how couples make sense of sexuality and how their interactional processes shape the relational patterns through which they navigate intimacy in the presence of pain. Drawing on episodic interviews with nine Italian heterosexual couples (M age = 34 years) affected by dyspareunia associated with vulvodynia and/or endometriosis, we conducted a reflexive thematic analysis through which four themes were co-constructed: "Between Body and Emotion: The Shifting Landscape of Sexuality"; "He Holds Back, She Consents: Silent Sacrifices"; "Together Alone: When Coping Is Delegated"; and "From Pain to Partnership: Reimagining Sexuality Together." Across narratives, couples described greater connection and intimacy when they were able to co-construct meanings and activate communicative spaces grounded in acknowledgment, mutual support, and negotiation. These findings underscore the importance of couple-centered clinical interventions that focus on interactive processes and promote reciprocity and a shared redefinition of sexuality. Adopting a relational and dialogical lens, the study highlights sexuality not as an individual function disrupted by pain, but as an evolving co-created process through which partners continually remake intimacy together.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.