ArticleBMC oral health2026
Validation of artificial intelligence-assisted CBCT analysis for predicting inferior alveolar nerve proximity to impacted mandibular third molars: a diagnostic accuracy study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) analysis system for predicting the spatial proximity of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) to impacted mandibular third molars (M3M), using expert radiologist assessment as the reference standard.
methodsA retrospective diagnostic accuracy study was conducted on an internal institutional cohort of 312 patients (mean age 28.21 ± 6.62 years; January 2021-December 2024). A deep learning system employing a modified U-Net architecture automatically segmented the IAN canal and M3M on CBCT and classified the IAN-M3M spatial relationship into three categories: no contact (> 2 mm), proximity (0-2 mm), and contact/overlap. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated on an independent hold-out test set of 486 M3 sites (283 patients). Two senior oral and maxillofacial radiologists provided the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, AUC, and Cohen's kappa were calculated; 95% CIs were derived by Wilson score method (proportions) and bootstrap resampling (AUC, kappa).
resultsThe AI system achieved an overall accuracy of 90.1% (438/486; 95% CI: 87.1-92.5%), weighted AUC of 0.925 (95% CI: 0.904-0.944), and Cohen's κ of 0.851 (95% CI: 0.821-0.912), indicating almost perfect agreement with the expert reference standard. Per-category sensitivity ranged from 88.2% to 91.2% and specificity from 92.8% to 97.4%. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean difference of 0.06 mm (95% LoA: -0.63 to 0.75 mm). Mean DSC was 0.90 ± 0.04 for IAN canal and 0.93 ± 0.03 for M3M segmentation. AI processing time was 4.75 ± 1.12 s versus 189.12 ± 41.99 s for expert assessment (39.79-fold reduction; P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed highest accuracy for mesioangular (93.1%) and horizontal (91.6%) impaction.
conclusionsThe AI-assisted CBCT analysis system demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy and excellent agreement with expert radiological assessment in predicting IAN proximity to impacted mandibular third molars, while substantially reducing processing time. These results support the potential of AI-driven automated CBCT analysis as a preoperative decision-support tool; however, the reference standard was radiographic rather than intraoperative, and prospective multicenter validation incorporating surgical outcome data will be required before definitive clinical deployment recommendations can be made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.