Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42603789›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Identifying sexual health concerns, risk-taking and violence using the newly developed SEXIT Adult tool in a Swedish public outpatient sample.

Alexis Gainza Solenzal, Kristofer Bjerså, Eva Elmerstig, Sandra Weineland, Johanna Ejblom, Sofia Hammarström

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexis Gainza SolenzalDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine. Family Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, 405 30, Sweden. alexis.gainza.solenzal@gu.se.ORCID 0009-0000-8370-4772
Kristofer BjersåDepartment of Surgery, Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8500-2245
Eva ElmerstigDepartment of Social Work, Centre for Sexology and Sexuality Studies, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2255-6547
Sandra WeinelandDepartment of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2428-4004
Johanna EjblomDepartment of Social Work, Centre for Sexology and Sexuality Studies, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0005-8253-0391
Sofia HammarströmDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine. Family Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, 405 30, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9282-1142

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSexual health concerns, risk-taking behaviors, and experiences of violence are common among outpatients but are rarely addressed during healthcare consultations. Patients seldom raise these issues themselves, and healthcare professionals (HCPs) often lack the knowledge and confidence to initiate discussions. The SEXual health Identification Tool (SEXIT) was developed to facilitate identification of sexual health concerns, risk-taking behaviors, and experiences of violence. This is the first study to evaluate the use of the SEXIT Adult questionnaire (18+) in a diverse Swedish outpatient population. The study examined the questionnaire's ability to identify individuals' needs of further discussion and explored whether responses indicating need for follow-up differed by age, gender identity, sexual orientation, or clinics sexual health specialization.

methodsConsecutive data collection was conducted using the paper-based SEXIT Adult questionnaire at 10 publicly funded outpatient clinics in Sweden during a three-month period in 2023-2024. The sample comprised 438 patients. Data were collected by 61 HCPs, including physicians, midwives, nurses, psychologists, and social workers. Analyses included descriptive statistics and parametric tests. Differences in the mean number of responses indicating need for follow-up were examined using one-way ANOVA (age, gender identity) and independent t-tests (sexual orientation, clinic specialization).

resultsMore than 90% of participants provided at least two responses indicating follow-up. Nearly half (49.1%) reported ongoing sexual problems, and 58.0% reported experiences of sexual violence. Furthermore, 4.4% reported having crossed another person's sexual boundaries. Patients attending clinics specializing in sexual health reported significantly more responses indicating need for follow-up than those attending non-specialized clinics. Individuals aged 30-54 years reported more such responses than both younger and older age groups. Sexually diverse participants reported more concerns than heterosexual participants.

conclusionsSEXIT Adult identified a substantial and likely unmet need for discussions about sexual health, risk-taking behaviors, and experiences of violence in outpatient care. The findings highlight the importance of routinely addressing these issues in clinical encounters and underscore the need for knowledgeable, inclusive, and tailored care, particularly for gender and sexually diverse populations.

Indexed as

OutpatientsRisk-TakingSexual HealthViolenceAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenYoung AdultOutpatient carePsychosocial interventionSexual behaviorSexual health

Identifiers

PMID42603789
PMCPMC13476919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.