ReviewProgress in biophysics and molecular biology2026
Gene therapy: The current trajectory of clinical and commercial translation.
Review in Progress in biophysics and molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid pace of innovation in gene therapy has ushered in a new era of transformative medicine, as demonstrated by landmark clinical success in the rapid development and administration of the first personalized n-of-1 treatment for carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase 1 deficiency. While the therapeutic efficacy and safety profiles of these cutting-edge modalities have steadily improved, the primary barriers to their broad clinical translation are becoming increasingly clear. The most significant challenges are no longer confined to the on-target potency of the therapeutic itself; rather, they are rooted in the complexities of commercial formulation and the limitations of a traditional regulatory framework. The scientific progress in drug efficacy, while continuous and necessary, is now outpaced by the significant logistical and procedural hurdles of scaling production, ensuring product consistency, and navigating a regulatory landscape that was not designed for the unique characteristics of these one-time, patient-specific therapies. This review will explore how production bottlenecks, matters of market demand and regulatory compliance, as well as the perpetuation of traditional systemic incentives now stand as the predominant forces impeding the translatability of advanced gene therapies from bench to bedside and delve into the prevailing institutional strategies for providing its access to patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.