ReviewSleep medicine reviews2026
Adverse experiences in childhood and adolescence in relation to sleep health in adulthood: An overview of systematic reviews and a global evidence map.
Review in Sleep medicine reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adversities in childhood and adolescence (ACA) can disrupt biological, developmental, and behavioral processes, potentially contributing to poorer sleep in adulthood. However, the certainty of the evidence of this association remains unclear. To synthesize and evaluate evidence of associations between ACA and adult sleep health (≥18 years) across World Health Organization regions while considering benevolent and risk factors, we conducted an overview of systematic reviews/meta-analyses. Using a predefined protocol, we systematically reviewed records published from database (n = 5) inception to February 2026, synthesized results, and performed quality and bias appraisal using validated tools, which allowed for assessment of the overall certainty of evidence. Twelve systematic reviews, including one relevant meta-analysis, were identified. ACA exposure was consistently associated with poorer sleep (e.g., insomnia symptoms, nightmares, higher arousals) in adulthood. Confidence in findings was generally critically low, and risk of bias was high, resulting in low certainty, overall. Evidence was concentrated in Regions of the Americas and Europe, with no representation from low-income countries. Reviews broadly summarized ACA-sleep associations, limiting synthesis of potential moderation by benevolent and risk factors. ACAs appear associated with poorer sleep health in adulthood; however, certainty remains low. More research across global populations is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.