ArticlePatient education and counseling2026
Remote interpretation during in-person medical encounters: Perspectives from professional Spanish-language interpreters.
Article in Patient education and counseling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesProfessional interpreters are critical for effective communication between providers and non-English-preferring patients, 62% of which are Spanish-preferring in the US. Yet research-to-date has not typically included interpreters' experiences. We examine perspectives of national sample of professional Spanish-language medical interpreters providing remote interpretation during in-person medical encounters.
methodsWe partnered with a national interpretation services company serving thousands of inpatient and outpatient healthcare organizations across the country. We recruited professional US-based Spanish-language interpreters. We interviewed 19 (of 32 eligible) interpreters (response rate 59%). We conducted content and thematic analysis.
resultsRemote interpreters during in-person medical encounters work set shifts of back-to-back calls across care settings with little-to-no information prior to being connected. Interpretation complexity varies by topic handled, patient characteristics, and whether patient is alone, and the provider uses their Spanish skills. Interpreters differentiated their approach based on patient needs, acting often as patient advocates (keeping patients calm, clarifying explanations, conveying needed details). With providers, interpreters engaged in strategies to build rapport and support communication. Interpreters believed they enhanced communication, improved visit flow, and helped address complex patient needs. They raised the need for provider training on effectively using interpreters (pacing, focused questions), consistent organizational supports (procedures concerning breaks, transferring calls), and reassessment of policies (providing interpreters patient information before calls).
conclusionsDuring in-person medical encounters, professional interpreters connecting via audio/video are critical to meet Spanish-preferring patients' needs. Interpreters' role extends beyond mere interpretation; they employ subtle, unique techniques with the provider and with the patient to enhance mutual understanding and facilitate effective patient-provider communication. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Remote professional interpreters' perspectives on their work environment and challenges they face can inform provider training and development of policies, practices and institutional supports that enable effective communication, enhance patient understanding, and ultimately lead to better care experiences and high-quality patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.