Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42603207›Full record

ReviewJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2026

Long non-coding RNA gene polymorphisms and risk of recurrent pregnancy loss: a meta-analysis.

Amaxsell Thiago Barros de Souza, Marcela Queiroz Lopes de Melo Martins, Juliana Dantas de Araújo Santos Camargo, Ricardo Ney Cobucci, Ana Katherine Gonçalves, Viviane Souza do Amaral

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amaxsell Thiago Barros de SouzaPostgraduate Program in Science Applied to Women's Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Marcela Queiroz Lopes de Melo MartinsJanuário Cicco Maternity School, Brazilian Company of Hospital Services, Natal, Brazil.
Juliana Dantas de Araújo Santos CamargoPostgraduate Program in Health Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Ricardo Ney CobucciPostgraduate Program in Science Applied to Women's Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Ana Katherine GonçalvesPostgraduate Program in Science Applied to Women's Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Viviane Souza do AmaralPostgraduate Program in Science Applied to Women's Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil. viviane.amaral@ufrn.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLong non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are key regulators of transcriptional, epigenetic, and post-transcriptional processes involved in implantation, trophoblast function, and early placental development. Genetic polymorphisms within lncRNA loci may alter their expression or regulatory activity, potentially contributing to recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). We aimed to evaluate the association between lncRNA gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to RPL.

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines and prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261298804). A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science from database inception to January 2026, without language or date restrictions. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using ROBINS-E. Meta-analyses were performed using fixed- or random-effects models according to heterogeneity. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium testing, sensitivity analyses, subgroup analyses by ancestry, and certainty of evidence assessment using the GRADE framework were conducted.

resultsSixteen case-control studies involving 11,088 participants were included, comprising 5169 women with RPL and 6454 controls. Eight polymorphisms across four lncRNA genes were quantitatively synthesized. Significant associations with increased RPL susceptibility were observed for HOTAIR rs4759314 (AG vs AA: OR, 2.75 [95% CI, 2.04-3.71]; GG vs AA: OR, 2.16 [95% CI, 1.09-4.26]; G vs A: OR, 2.06 [95% CI, 1.48-2.88]) and HOTAIR rs920778 (CC vs TT: OR, 2.00 [95% CI, 1.28-3.11]; TC + CC vs TT: OR, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.09-1.76]; C vs T: OR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.14-1.66]). A protective association was consistently identified for HOTTIP rs1859168 (CA vs AA: OR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.45-0.89]; CC vs AA: OR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.17-0.67]; C vs A: OR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.45-0.82]). Sensitivity analysis further strengthened the evidence for HOTAIR rs1899663, with significant associations emerging for TT vs GG (OR, 2.59 [95% CI, 1.46-4.61]) and T vs G (OR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.15-1.72]). Overall certainty of evidence for all pooled outcomes was rated as very low.

conclusionThis meta-analysis provides the first quantitative evidence that inherited variation within lncRNA loci may contribute to susceptibility to RPL. Variants in HOTAIR, particularly rs4759314 and rs920778, were associated with increased RPL risk, whereas HOTTIP rs1859168 showed a protective association. However, the certainty of evidence remains very low, and these findings should be interpreted cautiously until confirmed by large, well-designed, multi-ancestry studies with functional validation.

Indexed as

Long noncodingMeta-analysisPolymorphismRecurrent pregnancy lossRNASingle nucleotide

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.