ReviewJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2026
Long non-coding RNA gene polymorphisms and risk of recurrent pregnancy loss: a meta-analysis.
Review in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLong non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are key regulators of transcriptional, epigenetic, and post-transcriptional processes involved in implantation, trophoblast function, and early placental development. Genetic polymorphisms within lncRNA loci may alter their expression or regulatory activity, potentially contributing to recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). We aimed to evaluate the association between lncRNA gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to RPL.
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines and prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261298804). A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science from database inception to January 2026, without language or date restrictions. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using ROBINS-E. Meta-analyses were performed using fixed- or random-effects models according to heterogeneity. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium testing, sensitivity analyses, subgroup analyses by ancestry, and certainty of evidence assessment using the GRADE framework were conducted.
resultsSixteen case-control studies involving 11,088 participants were included, comprising 5169 women with RPL and 6454 controls. Eight polymorphisms across four lncRNA genes were quantitatively synthesized. Significant associations with increased RPL susceptibility were observed for HOTAIR rs4759314 (AG vs AA: OR, 2.75 [95% CI, 2.04-3.71]; GG vs AA: OR, 2.16 [95% CI, 1.09-4.26]; G vs A: OR, 2.06 [95% CI, 1.48-2.88]) and HOTAIR rs920778 (CC vs TT: OR, 2.00 [95% CI, 1.28-3.11]; TC + CC vs TT: OR, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.09-1.76]; C vs T: OR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.14-1.66]). A protective association was consistently identified for HOTTIP rs1859168 (CA vs AA: OR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.45-0.89]; CC vs AA: OR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.17-0.67]; C vs A: OR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.45-0.82]). Sensitivity analysis further strengthened the evidence for HOTAIR rs1899663, with significant associations emerging for TT vs GG (OR, 2.59 [95% CI, 1.46-4.61]) and T vs G (OR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.15-1.72]). Overall certainty of evidence for all pooled outcomes was rated as very low.
conclusionThis meta-analysis provides the first quantitative evidence that inherited variation within lncRNA loci may contribute to susceptibility to RPL. Variants in HOTAIR, particularly rs4759314 and rs920778, were associated with increased RPL risk, whereas HOTTIP rs1859168 showed a protective association. However, the certainty of evidence remains very low, and these findings should be interpreted cautiously until confirmed by large, well-designed, multi-ancestry studies with functional validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42603207What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.