SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026
Olfactory function after nasoseptal flap reconstruction in skull base surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopic skull base surgery is widely used for various skull base pathologies. The nasoseptal flap (NSF) is considered the gold-standard reconstructive technique to reduce postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. However, its impact on olfactory function remains unclear.
objectiveTo systematically compare olfactory outcomes between NSF and no-NSF reconstruction following skull base surgery.
methodsPubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing olfactory function in patients undergoing skull base surgery with NSF versus no-NSF reconstruction. Outcomes included: (1) number of patients with any degree of postoperative decline in olfaction at ≥ 6 months, (2) mean olfactory scores at 3 months, and (3) mean olfactory scores at ≥ 6 months. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics.
resultsSeven studies (n = 1,289) were included; 392 patients (30.4%) underwent NSF reconstruction. NSF was associated with a greater number of patients who experienced postoperative olfactory decline compared to no-NSF (RR 1.77; 95% CI 1.20-2.62; p = 0.004). At 3 months, NSF patients had worse olfactory scores (SMD - 0.32; 95% CI - 0.60 to - 0.05; p = 0.02). However, no significant difference in olfactory scores was observed at ≥ 6 months (SMD - 0.43; 95% CI - 1.63 to 0.77; p = 0.33).
conclusionNSF reconstruction is associated with worse short-term olfactory test scores and a higher proportion of patients with olfactory decline at ≥ 6 months. However, the severity of dysfunction at longer-term follow-up is comparable between groups, suggesting delayed but eventual olfactory recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42603189What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.