ArticleThe Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology2026
Women's Perspectives on Adjunct Therapies in IVF: Key Considerations and Influences.
Article in The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdjunct therapies are defined by regulatory bodies as non-essential treatments of uncertain clinical value that may be offered alongside established fertility interventions. Despite ongoing debate regarding their cost, potential adverse effects and lack of proven benefit, many patients' undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF) remain interested in trying alternative or complementary options to improve their chances of success.
aimsTo explore the key factors influencing women's decisions to consider or use adjunct therapies during IVF treatment. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn anonymous online survey was distributed to women in Australia who had considered or used adjunct therapies as part of their IVF journey. Respondents provided information on the types of adjuncts used, their perceived benefits and risks, sources of information and factors influencing decision-making.
resultsA total of 99 participants completed the survey. Most participants (94%, n = 93) used or considered adjuncts such as acupuncture and nutritional supplements, valuing perceived benefits and a sense of control despite limited scientific evidence of efficacy or safety. While many acknowledged the lack of robust data, few were deterred by this, highlighting the emotional and psychological drivers of decision-making. However, participants still valued accessible, independent information sources and open, empathetic discussions with clinicians.
conclusionsWomen undergoing IVF frequently consider and use adjunct therapies and report feeling well informed about their use, despite limited high-quality evidence supporting efficacy. Cost, risk and lack of proven benefit appear to have minimal influence on decision-making in the surveyed cohort. Given the ongoing and widespread interest in these treatments, clinicians should remain informed and open to discussing adjunct therapies to facilitate balanced, evidence-based and patient-centred decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.