ArticleInternational archives of otorhinolaryngology2026
Linear Versus Curved Incision for Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implants: Comparative Scar Assessment.
Article in International archives of otorhinolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In some patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss, or single-sided deafness, bone conduction implants (BCIs) offer an effective treatment; and scar appearance is a relevant factor in the overall outcome. Objective: To compare scar appearance and alopecia between linear and curved scalp incisions in patients undergoing transcutaneous BCIs surgery. Methods: An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary referral center in patients who underwent transcutaneous BCI. Postoperative follow-up period was between 6m to 3y. Scar evaluation was performed using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). Alopecia was defined as absence of hair follicles within 2 mm of the incision line. Statistical comparisons between linear and curved incisions groups were conducted, as well as multivariate analysis with logistic regression models. Results: Eighty-four cases were analyzed: 28 underwent linear incisions and 56 underwent curved incisions. Patients reported significantly better scar appearance with linear incisions in POSAS, Conclusion: Linear incisions may offer advantages in scar appearance with transcutaneous BCIs. Certain scar characteristics may also be influenced by the type of device and the surgical approach required for its placement, making it challenging to isolate this effect from that attributed solely to type of incision. These results highlight the need to consider both cosmetic factors and auditory outcomes in surgical planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.