ArticleCureus2026
Hidden Challenges in Laparoscopic Instrument Maintenance: A Qualitative Exploration of Training and Safety Concerns.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOver the past two decades, the rapid expansion of laparoscopic procedures has substantially increased dependence on sophisticated surgical instruments, camera systems, insufflators, energy devices such as monopolar and bipolar electrocautery, advanced bipolar and ultrasonic devices, and advanced sterilization technologies. Consequently, the success of laparoscopic surgery depends not only on surgical expertise but also on the effective functioning, maintenance, reprocessing, and handling of specialized equipment by the operating theater (OT) team.
aimThe study aimed to qualitatively explore the experiences, operational difficulties, safety concerns, and training needs related to laparoscopic instrument maintenance among OT technicians, nursing officers, and residents in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of a tertiary care teaching hospital. MATERIALS AND
methodsA descriptive qualitative study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the tertiary care teaching hospital. The study participants included residents, nursing officers, and OT technicians who were directly involved in laparoscopic surgeries and perioperative instrument management. A quota-based purposive sampling technique was used to ensure adequate representation, and a total of 30 participants were included, comprising 10 residents, 10 nursing officers, and 10 OT technicians. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were selected as the data collection method. The study was conducted and reported in accordance with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines. Data were collected using a semi-structured interview and continued until thematic saturation was achieved.
resultsThematic analysis of the FGDs identified six major themes related to laparoscopic instrument maintenance and handling practices: training deficiencies, equipment-related challenges, sterilization and reprocessing issues, instrument-handling difficulties, safety concerns, and workflow and communication barriers. OT technicians predominantly discussed technical and maintenance-related concerns, including damage to delicate cables, preventive servicing requirements, and sterilization limitations. Nursing officers mainly emphasized workflow coordination, patient safety concerns, and the need for standardized checklists. Residents primarily highlighted deficiencies in troubleshooting skills and formal laparoscopic training.
conclusionsThe present study highlights that laparoscopic instrument maintenance is an important yet often underrecognized component of minimally invasive surgical safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.