ArticleCureus2026
Label-Free Facial Nerve Identification During Parotidectomy Using Nerve Autofluorescence: An Initial Clinical Series.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Facial nerve (FN) dysfunction remains a clinically important complication of parotidectomy, even when recovery is ultimately complete. Traditional nerve identification relies on anatomic dissection, selective stimulation, and, in many cases, intraoperative monitoring (IONM). These approaches may be limited when anatomy is distorted. This study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and utility of autofluorescence-guided FN identification during parotidectomy. A retrospective case series was conducted in 18 patients who underwent superficial or total parotidectomy for parotid gland tumors. All procedures were performed by the same surgical team using standard operative technique and selective electrical nerve stimulation. Near-ultraviolet (NUV) autofluorescence imaging was obtained immediately after FN exposure and before further dissection. Raw grayscale and real-time colored overlay images were acquired. Quantitative image analysis was performed using manually selected regions of interest to measure nerve and background intensities, nerve-to-background ratio, longitudinal signal homogeneity, and apparent branch width. Given the case series design, findings were summarized using descriptive statistics. The cohort included 18 patients, 15 women and 3 men, who underwent superficial or total parotidectomy for parotid neoplasms. Final pathology showed pleomorphic adenoma in 15 cases and carcinoma in 3 cases, with deep lobe involvement in 1 case. Autofluorescence imaging generated clear contrast between the FN and surrounding tissue on grayscale and colored overlay views. Mean native grayscale nerve intensities ranged from 244.3 to 247.4 px, compared with background intensities of 41.7 to 45.8 px, yielding nerve-to-background ratios of 5.40 to 5.86. Colored overlay rendering increased the maximum nerve-to-background ratio to 10.16. Longitudinal signal remained uniform, with coefficients of variation (CVs) ranging from 0.028 to 0.043. No postoperative FN paralysis occurred, and all patients had House-Brackmann grade I function at six months. In this retrospective case series, autofluorescence-guided FN imaging during parotidectomy was feasible and provided consistent visual contrast between nerve and surrounding tissue without identified imaging-related safety concerns. These findings support further study of this approach as a useful adjunct to standard FN identification strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.