Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42603006›Full record

ArticleJournal of graduate medical education2026

Supporting the Transition: New Obstetrics and Gynecology Resident Perspectives on Resources for Residency Preparation.

Abigail Ford Winkel, Zachary Schoppen, Oluwabukola Akingbola, Nicolette Codispoti, Karen George, Maya M Hammoud, Helen K Morgan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of graduate medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abigail Ford Winkelis a Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6149-5842
Zachary Schoppenis a Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Corewell Health/Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1778-8634
Oluwabukola Akingbolais a Fellow Physician, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7326-7246
Nicolette Codispotiis a Resident Physician, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7612-7329
Karen Georgeis a Professor, Associate Dean for Students, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Office of Medical Student Education, Larner College of Medicine at University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2925-2351
Maya M Hammoudis a Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7829-7930
Helen K Morganis a Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6674-5377

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Numerous formal and informal resources exist to support the transition to residency. Little is known about how postgraduate year (PGY) 1 residents perceive and utilize these tools. Objective: To explore PGY-1 obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) residents' perspectives on the utility and impact of structured and informal resources supporting the transition to residency. Methods: We used a qualitative thematic analysis of in-depth interviews with PGY-1 OB/GYN residents using self-determination theory as a framework. In 2024, participants were recruited via email and social media from across the United States. Two residents performed virtual interviews. Three independent coders used inductive coding to analyze the data, then interpreted the patterns that emerged using self-determination theory as an interpretive framework. Results: A total of 11 interviews were performed. Three themes were identified in residents' experience that aligned with the core domains of self-determination theory: the heterogeneity of learning needs as new residents strive towards independence (autonomy), responsibilities for patient care serving as a powerful motivator for learning (competence), and the need for a supportive learning environment (belonging). Residents expressed diverse learning needs, and the abundance of tools often contributed to feelings of being overwhelmed. Conclusions: Tailoring support strategies to align with learning goals may enhance the effectiveness of transition resources and promote early resident growth and well-being. Educators may help learners identify resources but also allow for learner autonomy in setting learning goals, focus on practical skills to develop competence in clinical duties, and create structures to support a culture of belonging.

Indexed as

GynecologyInternship and ResidencyObstetricsClinical CompetenceEducation, Medical, GraduateFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicPersonal AutonomyQualitative ResearchUnited States

Identifiers

PMID42603006
PMCPMC13475765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.