Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42602943›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026

Therapist self-disclosure: a systematic review and brief person-centered framework for clinical practice and training.

Danielle Jeffery

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Danielle JefferyFaculty of Behavioural Sciences Yorkville University, Fredericton, NB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Therapist self-disclosure (TSD) is a widely used yet clinically complex intervention associated with both therapeutic benefit and potential harm. Existing literature suggests that TSD can strengthen the therapeutic relationship, enhance client engagement, and support culturally responsive practice. However, uncertainty remains regarding when, how, and why therapists should disclose personal information in clinical settings. Methods: This systematic review synthesized contemporary empirical literature examining the effectiveness, risks, benefits, and cultural considerations associated with TSD. A PRISMA-guided review process was employed, and findings were analyzed using both inductive and deductive thematic analysis. The review also examined the continued relevance of foundational recommendations for TSD and interpreted findings through the Rogerian core conditions of congruence, unconditional positive regard, and accurate empathy. Results: Findings indicated strong contemporary support for several of recommendations, particularly prioritizing client benefit, maintaining professional boundaries, exercising clinical intentionality, and returning focus to the client. However, ambiguity remained regarding appropriate disclosure content, levels of intimacy, and reasons for disclosure. This ambiguity was most effectively resolved when disclosure decisions were evaluated through relational attunement, client context, and therapeutic intent. TSD also emerged as an important component of culturally responsive practice, particularly when used to facilitate cultural broaching, relational safety, and engagement with issues of power and identity. Discussion: The findings suggest that the Rogerian core conditions provide a coherent theoretical framework for guiding TSD decision-making while requiring explicit attention to cultural sensitivity and power dynamics. Overall, effective and ethical TSD appears to depend less on specific disclosure characteristics and more on the therapist's attunement to client needs, therapeutic intent, and relational context. This review contributes a brief person-centered framework to support therapists' in-the-moment reflective decision-making regarding the ethical, effective, and culturally responsive use of TSD in clinical practice and training.

Indexed as

congruencecultural broachingcultural competenceperson-centered therapypsychotherapy trainingRogerian core conditionstherapeutic alliancetherapist self-disclosure

Identifiers

PMID42602943
PMCPMC13475611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.