ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2026
Negative BOLD response to interictal discharges in epilepsy using intracranial EEG-fMRI.
Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Combined electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging (EEG-fMRI) identifies regions of neural activity in response to interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs). While positive BOLD responses have historically been used to localize epileptogenic tissue, negative BOLD responses remain poorly understood. This study examined the spatial relationship between positive and negative BOLD responses to IEDs and their associations with epileptogenic tissue and the default mode network (DMN) using intracranial EEG-fMRI. Methods: 70 adult participants (57 met inclusion criteria), with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, underwent intracranial EEG-fMRI during presurgical monitoring. BOLD response maps were generated and maximum positive and negative clusters identified. Linear mixed models examined distances between BOLD clusters and both IED-generating contacts and contacts closest to clinically-defined seizure onset zone. A subset of 38 participants were assessed for spatial overlap and functional connectivity with the DMN. Results: Maximum positive BOLD clusters were significantly closer to both IED-generating contacts (estimate = -30.0, 95% CI [-55.5, -4.37]) and seizure onset zone contacts (estimate = -32.7, 95% CI [-57.5, -8.43]) compared to maximum negative clusters, when the absolute maximum is positive. Negative BOLD clusters demonstrated significantly greater spatial overlap with the DMN than positive clusters (22.5% vs 10.0%, p = 0.04). Conclusions: Positive BOLD responses provide superior localization of epileptogenic tissue compared to negative responses in intracranial EEG-fMRI. In contrast, negative BOLD clusters show greater spatial overlap with the DMN, suggesting they may reflect network deactivation at the time of IED events. These findings support prioritizing positive BOLD responses for clinical decision-making in presurgical epilepsy evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.