ArticleLearning health systems2026
Automatic Conversion of NICE Guidelines to an Executable Computational Model Using Large Language Models.
Article in Learning health systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) produce guidelines that provide evidence-based recommendations to support clinical care across England and Wales, but remain available in unstructured natural language form. Converting these guidelines into computable, logically coherent representations is an active area of research yet existing approaches typically focus on individual diseases, require substantial manual encoding, and do not scale. Recent advances in large language models offer an opportunity to automate much of this translation process. Methods: We present an end-to-end approach that automatically converts textual clinical guidelines into an executable model capable of generating explainable patient-specific recommendations. Our approach uses a stepwise LLM-based transformation with in-context examples that can be customized to the guideline of your choice. Each step generates human-inspectable intermediate artifacts, ensuring full transparency and modifiability. We apply the approach to both pancreatic and lung cancer NICE guidelines and use expert human review to assess the alignment of the produced rules as well as evaluating the executable model over 20 pancreatic cancer patient vignettes. Results: Human experts review demonstrated strong alignment between the natural language guidelines and the generated executable models, with the majority of guideline recommendations translated correctly. Most discrepancies involved partial omissions of specific details rather than incorrect logic, and instances of hallucinated or fundamentally incorrect rules were rare. When executed on the vignettes, the resulting executable models produced patient-specific recommendations with an Conclusion: This work demonstrates that LLMs can be used to automatically transform natural language NICE guidelines into interpretable and executable models. The models preserve guideline structure, allow transparent inspection and modification, and can be executed to generate patient-specific recommendations. Our findings highlight the feasibility of automated guideline generation, opening the door to scalable computable guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.