Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42602841›Full record

ArticleSurgery open science2026

Beyond resource management: Reframing surgical preference cards as educational tools.

Narges Rahmati, Majid Bagheri

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Narges RahmatiStudent Research Committee, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran.
Majid BagheriDepartment of Operating Room and Anesthesia, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical Preference Cards (SPCs) have traditionally been regarded as tools for standardizing surgical procedures, optimizing resource utilization, and improving operating room efficiency. Consequently, their educational value has received relatively little attention. However, emerging evidence suggests that SPCs can improve clinical performance, self-efficacy, clinical skills, and competence while reducing anxiety among operating room students. Drawing on Cognitive Load Theory and educational scaffolding, we argue that SPCs have the potential to serve as cognitive supports that facilitate learning in the complex operating room environment. We propose that SPCs should be recognized not only as resource management tools but also as educational resources and advocate for their integration into operating room curricula and digital educational repositories.

Indexed as

Clinical trainingCognitive load theoryEducational scaffoldingOperating room educationSurgical preference cards

Identifiers

PMID42602841
PMCPMC13475230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.