Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42602839›Full record

ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2026

Exploring the impact of revised physical activity guidelines on children and adolescents: an analysis of large Australian and New Zealand studies.

Adrian Bauman, Katherine Owen, Janette L Smith, Luke Wolfenden, Nicole Nathan, Justin Richards

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adrian BaumanSydney School of Public Health, Prevention Research Collaboration, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0369-4621
Katherine OwenThe University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5248-3030
Janette L SmithNSW Ministry of Health Population and Public Health Division, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Luke WolfendenSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle Australia, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Nicole NathanSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle Australia, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7726-1714
Justin RichardsTe Hau Kori - Centre for Physical Activity and Wellbeing, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Around 80% of children/adolescents globally do not meet recommended levels of physical activity (PA). The 2020 WHO consensus updated PA guidelines, changing from '60 minutes of PA/day' to at least 'an average of 60 min/day'. This means that attaining 420 min/week expresses the minimum threshold for PA.This analysis examined the effects of the changed guidelines on children/adolescents meeting PA guidelines. A coprimary research question examines single-item PA questions to determine the number of days of 60 min of activity that best reflect meeting the new PA guideline. Methods: Data were from five population-level Australian and New Zealand surveys (two representative population surveillance datasets and three large community interventions). PA questions included the single item question (days/week of 60 min) and detailed PA measures including International Physical Activity Questionnaire-adolescent questions. The single-item analysis used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to identify the best fit between the single-item and more extensive PA measures (maximising sensitivity and specificity). Results: The proportion meeting the old PA guidelines ranged from 28-55%, compared with 35-84% meeting the new guideline (average absolute increase of 26.2%). ROC analysis described areas under the ROC curve between 0.728 and 0.907. The best fit (Youden's Index >0.5) was 4-5 days/week where the single item best classified children and adolescents meeting the new guideline. Conclusions: The new guideline classified 26% more children and adolescents meeting updated PA guidelines. National research reports should use updated PA guideline criteria, and for surveillance, 4-5 reported days/week on the single PA question best estimates meeting the PA guideline threshold.

Indexed as

ExercisePhysical activitySurveillance

Identifiers

PMID42602839
PMCPMC13475078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.