ArticleCureus2026
Chronological Analysis of Visual Field and Optic Nerve Thickness for the Early Diagnosis of Bilateral Chronic Open-Angle Glaucoma With a Masquerading Growing Pituitary Tumor.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This case illustrates that a pituitary tumor can be masked by coexisting glaucoma, and that early differential diagnosis using optical coherence tomography (OCT), Central 24-2 threshold visual field testing, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to facilitate timely surgical intervention might avoid irreversible vision loss. A 73-year-old female was initially diagnosed with cataracts and glaucoma and monitored by retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) measurements using OCT, with readings of 97 μm in the right eye and 85 μm in the left eye in 2010. This case was followed continuously by the author for over 17 years. Although her intraocular pressure remained well controlled, her left eye RNFL progressively declined, dropping to 72 μm in 2022 and further to 62 μm in 2025. Visual field testing in 2016 revealed bitemporal defects, including a glaucomatous arcuate defect, which became increasingly pronounced by 2020 and, by 2025, demonstrated severe defects in the left eye, inconsistent with controlled glaucoma. MRI in 2025 confirmed a 2.2 cm adenoma compressing the optic chiasma with left optic nerve atrophy. In retrospect, review of the chart revealed early warning signs of a brain lesion, and the tumor was unfortunately identified only after significant vision loss had already occurred, underscoring that early diagnosis and timely surgery can prevent and sometimes reverse vision loss. Any atypical glaucoma presentation or inexplicable change in a patient with controlled glaucoma should therefore be carefully evaluated to exclude pituitary or other intracranial tumors, particularly through diligent visual field review and optic nerve examination. Glaucoma is fundamentally an optic nerve disease, and multidisciplinary cooperation is essential: neurologists managing pituitary tumor patients should refer them to ophthalmologists to rule out coexisting glaucoma, while ophthalmologists encountering unusual glaucoma cases should refer patients to primary care physicians or neurologists to exclude intracranial pathology. This report aims to remind clinicians of this rare but well-documented condition and highlight early diagnostic clues to prevent the pituitary tumor from being masked by a narrow specialty focus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.