Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42602818›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of otorhinolaryngology2026

Audiometric Profile in Post-COVID-19 Patients.

Mathias Antonialli Castoldi, Fernando de Andrade Quintanilha Ribeiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of otorhinolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mathias Antonialli CastoldiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0009-6818-4452
Fernando de Andrade Quintanilha RibeiroDepartment of Otolaryngology, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: There is uncertainty about whether COVID-19 is a risk factor for hearing loss. Objective: To evaluate the audiometric profile of patients post-COVID-19 infection and compare it to unaffected individuals, clarifying the correlation between COVID-19 and hearing loss. Additionally, we sought correlations between reported otorhinolaryngological symptoms during COVID-19 and changes in tonal thresholds. Methods: A cross-sectional study compared the pure-tone thresholds of 120 individuals with a confirmed history of COVID-19 and 120 unexposed controls, evaluated between 2021 and 2023. Results: The median tonal thresholds of exposed individuals were predominantly higher than those of unexposed individuals in both ears. The rate of hearing threshold alteration was 28.3% in exposed individuals versus 15% in unexposed individuals, with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.24 (95% CI: 1.18-4.25). Comparison of thresholds between the right and left ears of each exposed individual demonstrated asymmetric hearing impairment. The distribution of otorhinolaryngological symptoms included: nasal symptoms 67.5%; cough 65.8%; loss of smell 60%; loss of taste 56.7%; sore throat 47.5%; dizziness 30.8%; hoarseness 21.7%; tinnitus 19.2%; earache 18.3%; hearing loss 18.3%; and facial paralysis 0.8%. The association between reported symptoms and changes in pure-tone thresholds was statistically significant only for hearing loss (p < 0.001; OR = 8.9) and tinnitus (p = 0.005; OR = 3.7). Conclusion: Individuals exposed to COVID-19 showed worse tonal thresholds and a higher rate of hearing changes compared with non-exposed individuals.

Indexed as

COVID-19hearing losstinnitustonal thresholds

Identifiers

PMID42602818
PMCPMC13476101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.