ArticleCase reports in obstetrics and gynecology2026
Case Report of an Aggressive Angiomyxoma Presenting as Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Article in Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Case Report of an Aggressive Angiomyxoma Presenting as Pelvic Organ Prolapse.Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aggressive angiomyxoma (AAM) is a rare, slow-growing, locally infiltrative mesenchymal tumor of the pelvis and perineum, most often affecting women. Its nonspecific presentation and tendency to mimic more common vaginal or periurethral masses frequently delay diagnosis. Early recognition is critical to guide appropriate surgical planning, optimize resection, and reduce recurrence risk. In this case, a 61-year-old woman with prior vaginal hysterectomy presented with symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse, urinary incontinence, and occasional bleeding. Examination revealed a 10 × 3-cm protruding anterior vaginal wall mass with a spongy texture. MRI demonstrated a well-defined tubular lesion in the left distal vaginal wall extending towards the vulva. Intraoperative evaluation, including cystourethroscopy, diagnostic laparoscopy, and general surgery consultation, ruled out bowel involvement. The mass was excised via vaginal approach with preservation of surrounding structures. Histopathology confirmed AAM. Margins could not be assessed due to specimen disruption. At 6-week follow-up, the patient was asymptomatic with well-healed incisions, and ongoing surveillance with gynecologic oncology was arranged. This case highlights the importance of including AAM in the differential diagnosis of anterior vaginal wall masses. Multidisciplinary collaboration and advanced imaging are essential for accurate diagnosis and surgical planning. Given the tumor's locally infiltrative nature and high recurrence rate, long-term follow-up is warranted. Awareness of this rare pathology can aid timely recognition and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.