ReviewInternet interventions2026
Inclusion of underserved young people in digital public health interventions for mental health, sexual health and substance use: A systematic review and intervention component analysis.
Review in Internet interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This review examined the design features of digital public health interventions for mental health, sexual health and substance use that may affect equitable reach, engagement, and effectiveness for underserved young people. Materials and methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO for relevant systematic reviews published since 2020. We assessed them using the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies guidelines. We extracted randomised trials from six reviews and used them to inform searches in PsycINFO and CENTRAL for additional trials. We included mental health, sexual health and substance use interventions delivered solely or primarily through digital technologies to those aged 13-25 from underserved groups. Results: We included 62 trials of 56 interventions. Thirty-eight were sexual health interventions. We identified four coproduction components and six delivery components which may engage young people with interventions and turn knowledge into action. Evidence of effectiveness was strongest for substance use, with mixed or non-significant effects across other behavioural and biological outcomes. Discussion: Similar delivery components were evidenced across all outcome domains and underserved groups, indicating potential synergies in the ways interventions may help young people to navigate these interlinked issues. Coproduction was not well evidenced outside of sexual health interventions and those for sexual and ethnic minoritised youth. Conclusion: Whilst there is some indication of effectiveness for tailored interventions, further evaluations across a broader range of underserved groups are needed. Our framework supports an understanding of how tailored interventions may work for underserved young people that may inform future intervention design and evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.