ArticleCureus2026
Wake-Up Stroke Due to Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion and the Decision Between Medical Management and Stenting: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracranial arterial dissections (IAD) are rare but high-morbidity entities, especially in young adults. Optimal management remains controversial, ranging from conservative medical therapy to emergent endovascular intervention. A 27-year-old female presented with a "wake-up stroke" (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) 21). Initial angiography revealed a supraclinoid right internal carotid artery (ICA) dissection with 40% stenosis without hemodynamic compromise. Conservative management with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was initiated, given the patient's young age, leading to initial improvement (NIHSS 9), with a favorable clinical course; she was therefore discharged home five days after treatment. However, 48 hours after discharge, she suffered a neurological deterioration. Repeated angiography showed critical progression to 90% stenosis and M1 occlusion. An emergent rescue stenting with a LVIS EVO stent (4×21 mm) achieved total revascularization (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 3). The patient experienced a remarkable recovery, with substantial improvement in motor strength (3/5 in the upper limb, 4/5 in the lower limb) and normalized speech. This case highlights the dynamic and potentially unstable nature of supraclinoid dissections. Although initial medical management is standard, close monitoring is vital, as rapid progression may require urgent endovascular reconstruction to prevent catastrophic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.