ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026
Splenic neuromodulation as monotherapy and in combination with biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs for difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (ConsiderRAte): a randomised, sham-controlled, early feasibility trial.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05003310 (Multipart Exploratory Study to Evaluate Splenic Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multipart Exploratory Study to Evaluate Splenic Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Preclinical and early human evidence indicate that splenic neuromodulation modulates immune activity either independently or in conjunction with biologic or targeted synthetic (b/ts) disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and preliminary effectiveness of splenic nerve stimulation (SpNS) as monotherapy and in combination with b/tsDMARDs in adult patients with difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis. Methods: ConsideRAte was an early-feasibility, multicentre, randomised sham-controlled trial of an implantable device (Galvani System) delivering SpNS conducted across six centres in the USA and Netherlands. Adults with difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis, defined by inadequate response to at least two b/tsDMARDs, were implanted and randomised 1:1 to active (STIM ON) or sham (STIM OFF) stimulation following five sentinel patients. Participants received 12 weeks of stimulation in the monotherapy phase, defined as stimulation added to stable conventional synthetic DMARDS (csDMARDs) and/or low dose corticosteroids. Participants with Disease Activity Score using Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) improvement of ≥1.2 continued stimulation for an additional 12 weeks; non-responders discontinued stimulation and received baricitinib for 12 weeks. Thereafter, participants who were not in remission could receive adjunct tsDMARDs (baricitinib) together with SpNS in an open-label phase for six months, after which the participants moved to long-term-follow-up. The primary objective was to assess safety and tolerability of the Galvani System, its implantation and subsequent stimulation; key secondary outcomes included assessment of disease activity Disease Activity Score using C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) and patient-reported outcomes. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05003310). Findings: Between January 2022 and November 2024, eleven participants (Five Open Label STIM ON, six randomised to STIM ON (n = 3) and STIM OFF (n = 3)) were successfully implanted with the Galvani System. No device-related serious adverse events, or unanticipated adverse device effects occurred. During the 12-week monotherapy phase, mean DAS28-CRP decreased by 1.02 ± 0.45 (mean ± Standard Error, [SE]) in the STIM ON group compared with -0.34 ± 0.14 in the STIM OFF group. Five of eight (62.5%) STIM ON participants achieved a clinically meaningful improvement (≥1.0-point reduction). Nine participants entered the adjunct phase, with mean (±SE) DAS28-CRP decreasing with -2.95 ± 0.56 points at week 12 and -2.28 ± 0.69 points at week 24; 55.6% (5/9) achieved low disease activity (LDA) and 33.3% (3/9) remission. Two participants remained on monotherapy. In exploratory analysis, biomarkers were assessed in the monotherapy phase at the end of 12 weeks and trends for systemic proinflammatory cytokine reductions and in TH17 (T-helper 17) cell populations were observed in responders as defined by DAS28-CRP changes. Interpretation: SpNS demonstrated a favourable safety profile and was well tolerated in this small cohort. Clinical improvements were observed for monotherapy, and enhanced outcomes were observed for adjunct treatment resulting in multiple participants reaching LDA or remission. By engaging neuro-immune pathways rather than targeting single cytokines, this approach represents a novel therapeutic option that warrants further evaluation as stand-alone therapy or to complement existing pharmacological treatments for difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis patients. Funding: Galvani Bioelectronics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.