SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026
Artificial intelligence-enabled social robots for facilitating social interactions in patients with dementia: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The global rise in dementia, closely linked to aging populations, necessitates innovative interventions to address care challenges. Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Social Robots (AI-ESRs) present a promising approach by leveraging multi-modal communication to enhance social engagement and alleviate isolation. However, evidence regarding their efficacy remains inconsistent and fragmented. This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of AI-ESRs in enhancing social interactions among people with dementia, examines factors contributing to outcome variability, and provides recommendations for optimizing their integration into care models. Methodology: A comprehensive search was conducted across five electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, EBSCO, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) for peer-reviewed articles published up to May 2026. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies addressing AI-ESRs interventions in dementia care, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data extraction was standardized to ensure consistency across selected studies. Results: 16 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 9 pre-post studies. 15 studies demonstrated the potential of AI-ESRs to significantly enhance multiple dimensions of social interactions. These included verbal and non-verbal communication, the frequency and quality of interactions with caregivers, peers, and robotic systems, as well as behavioral indicators (e.g., smiling and laughter) and participation in activities. One study reported no statistically significant differences between intervention and control groups ( Conclusions: AI-ESRs show promise in facilitating social interactions among patients with dementia, with their effectiveness influenced by participant characteristics, intervention design, and contextual factors. Further research is warranted to explore long-term outcomes, tailor interventions to individual needs, and address ethical and implementation challenges, thereby advancing the integration of AI-ESRs into dementia care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.