Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42602617›Full record

ArticleOxford open neuroscience2026

A novel role for the infralimbic cortex in conditioned fear responding.

Julia R Mitchell, Samantha Tuberman, Rylin Lubash, Leticia C N Takasumi, Emmett Bergeron, Roberto Calitri, Mikaela A Laine, MaryClare Pikus, Victoria Vance, Leena Ziane and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oxford open neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Julia R MitchellPsychology Department, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4851-4890
Samantha TubermanPsychology Department, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Rylin LubashPsychology Department, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Leticia C N TakasumiPsychology Department, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Emmett BergeronPsychology Department, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Roberto CalitriPsychology Department, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Mikaela A LainePsychology Department, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115, United States.
MaryClare PikusPsychology Department, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Victoria VancePsychology Department, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Leena ZianePsychology Department, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Rebecca M ShanskyPsychology Department, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Freezing during Pavlovian fear conditioning is the most commonly used indicator of learned fear in rodents. Although freezing and its neural underpinnings have been widely studied, the field has largely ignored other potential indicators of learned fear. Darting, an escape-like conditioned fear response, occurs more frequently in females and is reliably predicted by a distinct behavioral phenotype: heightened shock response and decreased freezing compared to rodents that do not engage in darting. The experiments in this study sought to expand the field's understanding of conditioned fear by investigating the neural correlates of conditioned darting, focusing on the infralimbic cortex (IL) and longitudinal columns of the periaqueductal gray (PAG) due to their known roles in modulating defensive responses, including conditioned freezing. We find that fear conditioning elicits greater neural activity (measured by quantification of cFos expression) in the IL of females compared to males, but that IL activation corresponds to freezing only in Darters. We next used chemogenetic tools to excite or inhibit either the IL alone or IL-PAG projections prior to fear conditioning. IL manipulations in either direction reduced freezing in both males and females, while IL inhibition increased darting and shock response in females only, and the effects of circuit-specific manipulations were minimal. Together, our findings suggest a novel, role for the IL in driving defensive responses during fear conditioning that is not dependent on IL-PAG connectivity.

Indexed as

conditioned dartingfear conditioninginfralimbic cortexperiaqueductal grayrat

Identifiers

PMID42602617
PMCPMC13474271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.