ReviewAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui)2026
Strengths and weaknesses in techniques employed to measure the effects of dietary modulation on intestinal microbiota composition and function.
Review in Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, intestinal microbial habitats in monogastric animals are discussed, with special reference to the intestinal segments of poultry. Physicochemical conditions in different segments vary and determine the selection of microbes that have nutritional and thermodynamic possibilities to thrive in the habitat. Understanding basic microbial ecology is a prerequisite for the knowledge-based development of microbiota modulating feed additives and ingredients. A prevalent research approach involves analysing intestinal parameters and calculating correlations between analytical data, animal health, and performance. However, this method cannot establish causal relationships or capture the dynamics of microbial metabolite production and their uptake by the intestinal brush border. An alternative or complementary approach is to use an ex vivo method, where the fresh, fully functional, authentic microbial community of the target intestinal segment is studied in the laboratory. For this approach to produce unbiased data, extremely careful handling of the oxygen-sensitive bacteria and precise replication of the physicochemical conditions of the target intestinal environment are critical. With such an ex vivo model, the effect of feed additives on the rate of metabolite production by the native microbiota can be accurately evaluated. All research approaches have their pitfalls, the details of which are discussed. Small methodological details can have a major impact on the reliability of the results. The most reliable approaches are unfortunately labour-intensive, and a successful outcome requires the use of multiple approaches in parallel. Although no research approach is perfect, combining multiple methods allows a comprehensive understanding to emerge gradually.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.