Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42602597›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026

The relationship between trust and humility: a systematic review.

Jordon E Swain, Archie L Bates, Kate Conkey, Yasmine L Konheim-Kalkstein

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jordon E SwainUnited States Military Academy, West Point, NY, United States.
Archie L BatesUnited States Military Academy, West Point, NY, United States.
Kate ConkeyUnited States Military Academy, West Point, NY, United States.
Yasmine L Konheim-KalksteinUnited States Military Academy, West Point, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This work synthesizes the growing body of research exploring the relationship between the important constructs of humility and trust and addresses four important research questions. Design/methodology/approach: This systematic review follows the approach prescribed by the updated 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) statement. This review includes so-called "grey literature" to reduce bias and increase its utility. Findings: Of 76 full text records identified, 56 were deemed eligible and reviewed. Findings reveal that humility, while defined differently by those in different disciplines, engenders trust, but the relationship is complicated. Various mediators and moderators exist that impact the relationship. Further, the relationship between humility and trust may not be one way. Some research suggests that trust can influence humility. There are also numerous theories used to explain-and methods employed to understand-this complex relationship. Research limitations/implications: Future work can address measurement and methodological shortfalls, as well as explore inconsistencies in results by replicating select studies or examining potential moderators and boundary conditions. Future research could also expand its focus to include foreign language papers to reduce publication bias. Originality/value: This is the first review to systematically integrate the literature exploring the relationship between the two increasingly important topics of humility and trust. We identify trends and gaps in the existing literature and suggest future work that could better elucidate the relationship between humility and trust.

Indexed as

humblehumilityleadershipsystematic reviewtrust

Identifiers

PMID42602597
PMCPMC13474257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.