ReviewEpilepsy & behavior reports2026
Ethosuximide-induced lupus erythematosus: Unveiling a rare adverse reaction through systematic review.
Review in Epilepsy & behavior reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ethosuximide (ESM) is a first-line anti-seizure medication (ASM) for absence seizures and is generally well-tolerated. However, rare immune-mediated adverse reactions like drug-induced lupus erythematosus (DILE) have been reported. This study aimed to systematically review published reports of ESM-induced lupus erythematosus (LE). Methods: A comprehensive search of databases and sources was conducted up to June 2025 to identify eligible case reports and case series. Inclusion was based on predefined diagnostic criteria for DILE. The methodological quality of included studies was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklists. Extracted data included publication characteristics, patient demographics, clinical features, laboratory findings, management, and outcomes. Results: Twenty-eight publications encompassing 47 patients met inclusion criteria. The median age was 9 years, and 70.4% were female. Most patients presented with systemic manifestations such as arthralgia, fever, rash, and arthritis, with occasional renal and central nervous system involvements. Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) were positive in 95% of cases, typically at high titers with a homogeneous pattern. Anti-histone antibodies, characteristic of DILE, were detected in over 85% of tested patients, while anti-dsDNA antibodies were also reported in a notable subset. Discontinuation of ESM led to marked clinical improvement in 80% of patients, with or without adjunctive corticosteroids. Conclusion: ESM-induced LE, though exceedingly rare, should be suspected in patients on ESM presenting with systemic autoimmune features. Its clinical and serological profiles overlap those of idiopathic systemic lupus erythematosus and classic DILE. Early recognition and prompt discontinuation of ESM typically result in rapid remission and may prevent unnecessary prolonged immunosuppression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.