ArticlePeerJ2026
Body mass index and physical fitness in university students: sex differences and nonlinear patterns in a large cross-sectional study.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Body mass index (BMI) is routinely used in university health surveillance, but its sex- and grade-specific association with multidimensional physical fitness, including nonlinear patterns, remains unclear. Methods: Data from 16,292 university students (8,505 females; 7,787 males; aged 17-23 years) who completed the national standardized fitness assessment were analyzed in this cross-sectional study. Vital capacity, 50-m sprint, standing long jump, sit-and-reach, 800/1,000-m run, and muscular endurance were standardized within sex to derive a Physical Fitness Index (PFI), with time-based tests reverse-scored. Two-way analyses of variance examined associations of sex, academic grade, and BMI category with PFI. Sex- and grade-specific quadratic models were used to characterize BMI-PFI curves and estimate the model-derived BMI value associated with peak predicted PFI. Pearson correlations assessed associations between PFI and individual fitness components. Results: Academic grade was associated with PFI, whereas no overall sex effect was observed (sex: Conclusion: BMI was associated with multidimensional physical fitness in this large cohort of university students, with lower PFI observed at both low and high BMI values. BMI showed a stronger association with PFI than academic grade, particularly in males. These findings support BMI-informed and sex-sensitive fitness monitoring, but should be interpreted as cross-sectional associations because body-composition and behavioral measures were unavailable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.