Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42602563›Full record

ReviewJournal of ultrasonography2026

Genicular nerves: ultrasound anatomy, scanning techniques, and clinical implications.

Stanzin Spalkit, Shashank Chapala, Kapil Shirodkar, Ankit Shah, Bipin Shah, Rajesh Botchu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ultrasonography, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stanzin SpalkitDepartment of Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6392-6578
Shashank ChapalaDepartment of Radiology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology,India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2956-0270
Kapil ShirodkarDepartment of Radiology, Royal Lancaster Infirmary,United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6301-1776
Ankit ShahDepartment of Radiology, Eclat Imaging, Mumbai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5501-1849
Bipin ShahDepartment of Radiology, Eclat Imaging, Mumbai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7871-5949
Rajesh BotchuDepartment of Musculoskeletal Radiology, The Royal Orthopedic Hospital,United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7998-2980

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genicular nerves are sensory nerves that innervate the knee joint, playing a crucial role in pain transmission. Because of their small size, they are frequently underappreciated and overlooked during routine ultrasound examinations. With the advent of high-resolution ultrasound, these nerves can be visualized directly, facilitating targeted interventions. A detailed understanding of genicular nerve anatomy, ultrasound landmarks, and characteristic imaging appearances has significant clinical implications for managing knee pain. Given the high prevalence of chronic knee pain due to osteoarthritis and post-operative conditions, ultrasound-guided genicular nerve blocks and radiofrequency ablation are increasingly utilized. Traditionally, genicular nerve procedures, targeting three nerves (the superomedial, superolateral, and inferomedial genicular nerves), were performed under fluoroscopic guidance. However, ultrasound offers distinct advantages, including real-time visualization of soft tissues, the absence of radiation exposure, and precise targeting of anatomical locations using revised landmarks and Doppler signal. These advancements have enabled more comprehensive targeting of five nerves: the superomedial genicular nerve, superolateral genicular nerve, inferomedial genicular nerve, recurrent peroneal genicular nerve, and the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve. Although ablation of the recurrent peroneal genicular nerve carries a risk of injury to the common peroneal nerve, potentially resulting in foot drop, precise localization through ultrasound-guidance may help mitigate this complication. This article provides a comprehensive review of genicular nerve anatomy, ultrasound techniques, and interventional approaches, emphasizing the clinical relevance of ultrasound-guided procedures for managing knee pain and diagnosing nerve pathologies.

Indexed as

anatomygenicular arterygenicular nervesknee painultrasound

Identifiers

PMID42602563
PMCPMC13474172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.