ArticleCureus2026
Urological Causes Mimicking Acute Abdomen: Diagnostic Challenges in General Surgical Emergency Practice.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Urological disorders are important differential diagnoses in patients presenting with an acute abdomen to a general surgical emergency unit. Conditions such as ureteric colic, obstructive uropathy, acute pyelonephritis, urinary retention, renal trauma, and testicular torsion may simulate appendicitis, intestinal obstruction, biliary colic, or perforation peritonitis. This clinical overlap may delay correct diagnosis, particularly when urinary symptoms are subtle or absent. This study aimed to assess the pattern of urological conditions mimicking acute abdomen and the diagnostic difficulties encountered during initial surgical evaluation. Materials and methods This hospital-based observational study included patients who presented with acute abdominal pain to the general surgery emergency department and were later confirmed to have a urological cause. Data regarding age, sex, presenting symptoms, initial clinical impression, urine findings, renal function tests, ultrasonography, computed tomography findings, final diagnosis, treatment given, and outcome were recorded and analyzed. Results A total of 80 patients were included. Most patients were male subjects (n=56; 70%), and the commonest age group was 31 to 50 years (n=34; 42.5%). Acute abdominal pain was present in all patients, followed by vomiting 42.5%, fever 32.5%, dysuria 28.8%, flank pain 45.0%, and hematuria 21.3%. The most frequent urological cause was ureteric calculus with ureteric colic (n=36; 45.0%), followed by acute pyelonephritis (n=14; 17.5%), obstructive uropathy (n=11; 13.8%), acute urinary retention (n=8; 10.0%), renal or ureteric trauma (n=6; 7.5%), and testicular torsion presenting as lower abdominal pain (n=5; 6.2%). At first assessment, 31 (38.8%) patients were suspected to have a primary general surgical condition. Ultrasonography supported the diagnosis in 58 (72.5%), while computed tomography was required in 29 (36.3%) patients. Conservative treatment was sufficient in 44 (55%) patients and 36 (45%) required urological intervention. Conclusion Urological emergencies can closely resemble acute surgical abdomen. Careful urinary history, focused examination, urine analysis, renal function assessment, ultrasonography, and selective computed tomography help in early diagnosis and prevent unnecessary surgical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.